Review for Black Oak Presents 2:46 pm / 21 March 2007 by chris lempa, at The Radical Whole
T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism
By Hakim Bey
Review by Bruce Bruceson
We have all heard somebody utter the ridiculous phrase, “if you don't like it here you can just get up and leave!”
Critics of the dominant culture learn to live with such phrases. They are not much different than the rustling of leaves or background chatter at a café. Occasionally, however, it is worth asking “where shall I go?”
To the best of my knowledge, there are people governing every inch of inhabitable land. As if that weren't enough, we are now colonizing
All of our actions are subject to someone else's rule. Degrees vary, but the fact remains − we are subject to someone else's rule.
Many people have offered solutions to free ourselves. Bookstores are full of self-help books. The late, great Harry Browne wrote a magnificent tome entitled How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World. Many individuals have found ways to go unnoticed. However, noone has tackled this issue in the same manner as Hakim Bey.
Bey, also known as Peter Lamborn Wilson, is a very interesting person. However, I am not interested in heroification, only ideas and action (for more one Bey go to http://www.hermetic.com/bey/).
The Temporary Autonomous Zone (hereafter TAZ) is Bey's contribution to the quest for freedom. According to Wikipedia – the sometimes flawed yet anarchistic internet encyclopedia – TAZ is “the sociopolitical tactic of creating temporary space that eludes formal structures of control.”
The essay itself is composed of eight sections: Pirate Utopias, Waiting for the Revolution, The Psychotopology of Everyday Life, the Net and the Web, “Gone to Croatan”, Music as an Organizational Principle, The Will to Power as Disappearance, and Ratholes in the Babylon of Information.
Bey begins the essay with a mini-history (of sorts) about Pirate Utopias – an early predecessor to TAZ – these utopias were gatherings of pirates. These pirates were similar to the portrayal in the amusing film Pirate’s of the Carribean – people living in autonomous enclaves outside of any established governing body. He notes that these pirates communities were not much different than some of today's intentional communities. For example, a gift economy replaced the mixed socialist/capitalist economy that most people live under.
This was possible prior to modern technology. In present times, the CIA and Pentagon currently have the ability to hone in on every nook and cranny of the Earth with the touch of a button. Worse, these areas can be decimated with the same ease.
Unfortunately, Bey seems to idolize these societies even though they rely on other people’s labor and plunder. This criticism was also raised by Murray Bookchin and deserves to be repeated. How liberating is an action if it leads to the further enslavement of others? I would love to “eat, drink, and be merry” without having to worry about working, but not if it is going to keep down others! Pirates were not amiable characters that we should emulate. Bey describes “Pirate Utopias” as “primitive and devoted to grim business, the net nevertheless functioned admirably.” “The net” refers to the various enclaves of pirate communities.
The obvious question remains, what is admirable about so-called pirate society? The use of the word pirate is troubling, especially considering Bey’s command of language. Words are important and I fear that talking about pirate society in favorable light will take away from the more positive aspects Bey brings to the table. Bookchin’s criticisms go further. He questions Bey’s anarchist credentials based on his lifestyle and other writings – there isn’t space in this article, nor the desire of the author to inspect these claims.
So how do we escape? How can we find anything resembling liberation when we can be constantly tracked?
First and foremost we must divorce ourselves from the mindset of collective liberation. To quote the essay:
“To say that 'I will not be free until all humans (or all sentient creatures) are free' is simply to cave in to a kind of nirvanastupor, to abdicate our humanity, to define ourselves as losers.” Unfortunately these words can be misconstrued. If our actions harm or hinder the progress of others, then we are in violation of the Non Aggression Principle and Natural Law (See Lysander Spooner’s Natural Law or the Science of Justice available online at http://www.lysanderspooner.org/NaturalLaw.htm. This essay is also available in the excellent book The Lysander Spooner Reader, edited by George Smith).
So what are Bey’s revolutionary actions? An excerpt from Poetic Terrorism
Weird dancing in all-night computer-banking lobbies. Unauthorized pyrotechnic displays. Land-art, earthworks as bizarre alien artifacts strewn in State Parks. Burglarize houses but instead of stealing, leave Poetic-Terrorist objects. Kidnap someone and make them happy.
Weird dancing won’t change the world, but it will help free our minds from the constraints of a stressful world, and that is the point of TAZ.